Monday, August 29, 2011

"The Help"...Everybody Deserves To Feel They "Is Important"

Recognizing the significant obstacles that the child was going to face in developing a healthy self-image, Aibileen, the fictitious maid in the current cinematic smash hit, The Help, would religiously tell to the equally fictitious toddler, Mae Mobley Leefolt, "You is kind, you is smart, you is impor-tant." Simple, earnest, incredibly insightful and profound words. These words struck me because they are similar to those that my wife and I have said to our eleven-year-old daughter, who was born with mild cerebral palsy, almost every day of her life, particularly as we drive her to and drop her off at school. "Have the sweetest heart, be the best minder, do your best, and be happy." Funny how we can find so much of ourselves, so many parallels to our own lives in the works of others, in their songs, and movies, and books. Speaking of books...


You know, I wish that I loved to read...I really, really do...but I don't. Except for surfing the internet for info that I want or need, reading a little history and politics here and there, and perusing some sports news specific to my now limited interests, I don't even like reading, much less love it, a trait that is very unlikely to change at this late stage of the game. Thank goodness for the talents and gifts of screen writers, directors, and actors. Their artistic adaptations and interpretations provide non-readers, like me, with the opportunity to experience the essence of many outstanding and imaginative stories that we would otherwise never take the time to enjoy. After seeing The Help with my wife last Saturday evening, I can tell you that, were I ever to work up the "want to" to read a book, I would love to read the 2009 novel by Kathryn Stockett (amazingly her first) that the movie is based upon. A few weeks ago, I had not even heard of this book. The first time that I did was in a Facebook post. My cousin's daughter (that would make her my cousin, as well, of course) remarked that she had seen this movie and that, while it was quite good, it left her very disturbed. Having never heard of it, I had no inkling as to why or how it had affected her so. Now, I know. 


The novel, screenplay, and movie take place against the backdrop of my childhood...in the white, middle class households of the South in the early 1960s (just as the Civil Rights movement was really beginning to percolate) that employed African-American women as domestic workers...no, as maids, or as many casually referred to them, as "the help" (thus, the title). In my house back growing up and even shared among the households of my extended family, we had our own Constantines, Aibileens, even our own Minny (hopefully, sans any "Eat my..." episodes). My second cousin, I realized after seeing the film, as a child of the North and a generation removed from this setting, had no real basis of experience to help her internalize the story line, so it makes great sense to me now how she might have been so troubled by what she saw portrayed in this movie. It especially makes sense, given the fact that seeing it left me profoundly afflicted, as well.


Central to the film's plot were the subtle, not so subtle, and overt words and actions, be they benignly or malevolently intended, of white Southerners during this "Leave it to Beaver" era that, over time, worked to strip away the self-esteem and minimize the humanity of these women who labored in their homes for ten hours a day, six days a week, cleaning, cooking meals, doing the laundry and ironing, and, in many instances, serving as surrogate mothers to their children. For someone of my generation, who grew up in this very setting, who remembers seeing the separate waiting rooms and water fountains for Blacks on the other end of the halls in the dentist's and doctor's offices, for someone who didn't attend school with a single person of color until the sixth grade and who remembers even a good and godly teacher calling that student "New Caledonia" when he addressed him (though I am not sure why or how referring to someone as an island in the South Pacific was a racial slur, I am certain that it was intended to be), watching as humiliation after humiliation, degradation upon degradation was heaped upon these fictional housekeepers, these characters playing thinking, feeling people with families, hopes, dreams, and problems of their own, was simultaneously poignant, heart rending, and just plain difficult to watch. As I did so, I returned to my childhood in my mind's eye, and I began to wonder and, perhaps, to agonize a bit. Was it ever like being in Hilly Holbrook's or Elizabeth Leefolt's households for the women who worked in my home? Did the members of my family ever make these ladies feel debased in any way? Even in the slightest, most unintended manner? Did I ever treat any of them in such a manner? God, I hoped not. 


Fifty years removed, my crusty, old memory sheds no light on these vexing questions. My knowledge of my parents and their hearts tells me that they absolutely did not, could not have. My knowledge of my own heart leads me to hope that I didn't, tells me that I couldn't have, tells me that, hope upon hope, I wouldn't have. But the historian in me tells me that I just can't be sure that I/we never did. You see, goodness in people knows no boundaries on the calendar of history. There were good people in eras past, there are good people now, and there will be good among the people that have yet to be. Regardless of their goodness (or other attributes to the contrary), however, we are all products, to some degree, of the times in which we live, of our experiences. Case in point, Abraham Lincoln. Mr. Lincoln, of course, is hailed as one of the heroes of our nation, beloved by black and white, for having the courage to emancipate the slaves and to lead our nation through its darkest internal struggle. His courage an character are to admired and emulated, right? But even Lincoln was a product of the his times. In his fourth debate with Stephen A. Douglas in his 1858 campaign to for the US Senate seat from state of Illinois, Lincoln said the following: "I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races – that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And in as much as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race...". Did he do a complete one-eighty regarding his prejudices when he issued the Emancipation Proclamation a little over four years later? I don't think so. Did he conclude that slavery as institution was wrong and did he make the decision that proclaiming Southern slaves to be free was a strategic and expedient gambit to increase Northern support for the war, to stir the pot of hope among Southern slaves, and to plant the seeds of paranoia in Confederate minds? Certainly. But I really don't think that the profound racism expressed in those words that he spoke in 1858 was cleansed away by some mythical mantle of morality that accompanies the Oath of Office. So is it possible that the parents and children of my generation, regardless of  how pure of heart and intention, could have been guilty of at least some subtle mistreatment of those who most often toiled to make their houses homes, making them to feel as though they were second-class citizens? Yep, it's possible...very possible. But God, I hope not.


Like I said, this movie is discombobulating on so many levels to anyone with a conscience, but especially so to those who could see and feel snapshots of their own childhood in vignettes from the film, scenes so visceral in their familiarity. The movie made me sad. It made me reflective. Reflective about my words and actions, past and present, as well as about those of others. See, I don't understand how we purposefully hurt other people. Almost all of us have hurt or mistreated others in some way at some time, but it is hard to understand it when it is premeditated or calculated. Every iota of hurt that I have ever caused has made my heart hurt. And I especially don't understand how people can be violent towards others for any reason other than self-defense. I mean attacking someone simply because they pull for a different sports team, really? Seriously? I guess the positive thing about having your psychological and emotional cage rattled is that sometimes it can change your behaviors and your perspective. The experience of seeing this movie left me more determined to treat the people that I come into contact with in this life civilly, to treat them with respect and dignity. And I'm not talking about the people that it is easiest to treat that way. No, I'm talking about those that I come into contact with casually, that answer my customer service calls on the phone (I was so nice to that lady that I could not understand that tried to help me with a phone issue yesterday!), that wait on me in the restaurant, that I pass on the street, even those that, through their own words and actions, don't even necessarily seem to deserve it or that don't respond to me in kind. While I've never been unkind to any of these groups that I am aware of, I will make an extra special endeavor to treat illegal aliens, the Chinese, and Democrats with the utmost respect and civility (Disclaimer: this does not mean, however, that I will concede that is okay to break the law, or to try to dominate my country, or that I will agree with a liberal point of view). Seeing The Help has reinforced to me that all of God's children deserve to be treated as though, to feel as though they "is impor-tant."

This week, I added this to her verbal fare on the way to school in the morning, "You is kind, you is smart, you is impor-tant...". As the ancient Chinese proverb (aren't they all?) states, so very often art merely imitates life...and in this case, vice versa. Why don't you go out today make someone feel important?







Don't Know 'Bout You, But China Scares the Shih T(zu) Out of Me

Anyone even casually acquainted with me knows that one of my passions in life is Duke basketball (men's, of course). I mean, come on, the Duke logo is my Facebook profile pic for the better part of each winter. Well, you can imagine my delight this past week, as the seemingly endless, summertime, "no sports worth watching" doldrums (love baseball but can't watch it on TV...more spitting and genitalia adjusting than sport-specific actions during the three hours invested in viewing a game) wound down toward college football season, when ESPNU televised three of the Blue Devils' four-game "friendship" tour of Asia (I laughed at the conclusion of the third Chinese game when the announcer said, "Well, that concludes Duke's tour of Asia...join us as the Blue Devils travel to the United Arab Emirates for a game at 1:30 PM on Thursday"...uh-h-h-h...dude, the UAE is in Asia). 


As I mentioned in my last post analyzing Duke's sweep of its three game set with China's junior national team, I was struck by an image of the two teams side by side at mid-court during a pre-game photo opp...those Chinese guys were freakin' huge! I mean, Duke has one of the biggest teams that we've had in years, with six players taller than 6'8", but it appeared to me that man for man, position by position the Chinese were taller, longer, bigger, thicker. And as the games themselves unfolded, even though my Dukies prevailed, of course, (whenever my wife asks if Duke won, my response is always, "We played?"), the games were very, very hard fought and competitive, at times more like football in their physical nature than hoops. In the sport of basketball, it seems evident that, in terms of physicality and skill, the Chinese, as well as much of the rest of the world as evidenced by Lithuania's victory over the USA in this summer's World University Games and by the increasingly high numbers of foreign players drafted by NBA teams over their U.S. collegiate counterparts, have closed the competition gap. In other words, the bloom is off the world's awe of us, as well as off our dominance of the game. Frankly, it also occurred to me while watching the often rugged first contest, this days before the brouhaha that erupted between Georgetown, on its own apparently, "not so much friendship" tour, and a Chinese club team, that if a fight were to break out the good guys (the Dukies, of course) might be in quite a pickle. From the video that I saw of the Georgetown brawl, the Hoyas seemed to be getting the worst of it, even before some chopstick-wielding, water bottle throwing Chinese fans got involved in the melee.


Anyway, to my point...watching and then reflecting upon China's obvious and somewhat troubling ascension in basketball served as a segue into my musing about the entire myriad of misgivings that I have about the "Big Red Machine" of modern geopolitics,  about how much it has progressed from its humble, "radish communist" origins of the early century past, about its present position upon the greater world stage, and about its plans and aspirations for the future. As I did so, I began to reflect upon that which I already knew about China, as well as upon the numerous and often odious reports that I have heard and read about the Ginko Pinkos (I realize this is neither PC nor in compliance with "apology diplomacy", but then again, neither am I) in the news media in recent months and weeks.


Here's what I know. China has, by far, the largest population in the world, currently estimated at just a smidgen (as billions go) under seven billion people. Even with the globe's third largest population (keep in mind, old folks like me, that the USSR has been bye-bye for some time now, so we've bumped up in the rankings), the United States' sum stands at a relatively paltry 312 million. Now, even with my very limited mathematical skills, I can cipher that the Red Chinese outnumber us by about 22 to 1. History has been unkind to those facing these kinds of odds. While the Greeks certainly did themselves proud for a few days versus incredible odds at the Battle of Thermopylae, they ultimately were slaughtered. The South stretched the Civil War out for four years before succumbing to a 4 to 1 disadvantage (that is, after eliminating Southern slaves from the equation). In other words, in war, if it ever came to that with China, God forbid, this kind of disparity in human resources bodes poorly for those on the "1" side of such a ratio. Besides, Americans should recall, but probably don't, that while the "Chosin Few" valiantly fought their way through the bugle blowing, gong sounding Chinese throngs that encircled them as they pushed toward the Yalu River in late 1950 they were largely fighting for their survival and were subsequently evacuated as the entirety of UN (largely US) forces were completely driven from North Korea by the "yellow horde" early in the Korean War. Like I said, them's tough odds.


Other attributes of the no longer "sleeping dragon" serve as harbingers of our need for increased angst regarding China and its aspirations and goals for the future. In addition to its massive populus, China is also the third largest nation in the world in land area, in a virtual tie with the US for that slot, and like us is rich in natural resources. In addition, this behemoth of both natural and human resource riches is centrally managed by the second longest functioning Communist regime in existence. While communism admittedly has a poor track record of producing the kind of prosperity that leads to high rankings in standard of living for its practitioners, recent historical exemplars, such as the phoenix-like rise from the ashes of WWI and shackles of Versailles by Germany under Nazism and the relatively meteoric ascension from feudalism by both the former Soviet Union and post WW II China, clearly suggest that totalitarianism and centralization can be effective instruments for driving the rapid development of general economic, military, and geopolitical power. Unfortunately, totalitarianism also has a rather loathsome and unpropitious track record for meting out oppression, brutality, and terror upon its own people. In my mind, if a government can butcher its own with such wanton disregard and violence, it is wicked scary to imagine how they would treat foreigners who might obstruct the path to its achieving national and cultural greatness. What about the Chinese people themselves? I believe that the Chinese, like people everywhere, are a people of inherent goodness, possessing hopes and dreams for personal and family happiness and well-being. However, they are also a proud people, a people whose collective memory still aches from the humiliation of a century and a half of foreign intervention, invasion, and usurpation. Their government perpetuates the cumulative memory of this national shame by instilling in school children a rabid love of Chinese sovereignty and by indoctrinating them with a modernized spirit of the Boxers, the xenophobic, ultra-nationalist Chinese cult of the late 19th century which hated and rose up against foreign encroachment and colonialism in the motherland. In terms of their own aspirations for their nation, the Chinese people, much like Americans of the past, I am afraid, believe in striving for excellence. Their drive and determination might be well characterized through a couple of popular Confucianisms (while the Communists originally attempted to eradicate most traditional and competing dogma, they have selectively borrowed from Confucius for propaganda purposes in recent years, much the same as antebellum Southerners drew upon biblical scriptures to rationalize the institution of slavery): "It does not matter how slowly you go so long as you do not stop" and "Wheresoever you go, go with all your heart." It would seem that, with this kind of  impetus, China is moving steadily, as does the ancient Huang He toward the Yellow Sea, toward reaching its destiny among the powers of the world.


Now, put aside for a moment, if you will, the fact that China holds about ten percent of the our national debt, making it our largest foreign creditor, a chilling actuality that candidate Obama lamented over while criticizing and blaming George Bush when he still was president in 2008 and that ironically served as a key bone of contention and concern in the recent debt ceiling debate which he helped to create (and then went largely MIA on during its climax). What other recent actions, developments, and events should serve as red flags regarding the looming threat to us posed by the Middle Kingdom? Try this little experiment, make a t-chart and then go around your house writing down household items in the left-hand column and the country where they were manufactured on the right. You will quickly understand where I am going with this. China's economy grew by a robust 10.3% last year while our own staggered along at comparatively anemic 2.83 % during 2010. Given that about 10% of all the world's consumers are Chinese, this is not a very reassuring trend in terms of our maintaining our status as the world's chief economic power. Another flare?...rare earth minerals. What the hell are those you might say? While I am not scientifically inclined either, I know that they are hard to mine elements that are critical components of an increasing number of the technological thingies that we use in everyday life. Well, China produces about 95 % of the world's rare earth minerals, and over the last few years, it has reduced exports of these precious and important elements by 40%, virtually holding these metals hostage in the face of a growing demand for them by the rest of the world. Need more? Back in May, the Chinese, working in cahoots with our friends, the Pakistanis, accessed our formerly secret and incredibly expensive stealth helicopter technology that was utilized, but unfortunately not completely destroyed, in the successful US raid which culminated in the assassination of Usama Bin Laden. As recently as this month, the "Blue Army," China's self-admitted, elite "cyber warfare" force suspected of repeated encroachments into computer networks around the world, including our own, in recent years, was accused of a recent series of hacks into the systems of over seventy organizations and governments, including that of the United Nations. That ain't all. Also earlier this month, the Chinese announced that their very first aircraft carrier was beginning sea trials, foreshadowing, perhaps, an all-out Chinese push to minimize, negate, and perhaps completely reverse one of the strategic, military advantages that the U.S. has held over the Chinese, its naval and air superiority, a move that could provide China with a gambit to eventually squeeze America out of its Far East presence altogether. And finally? The last straw? Just last week there was that whole playing the Blue Devils way too close in basketball thing...now that just hits too close to home!!!


Taken together, all of this leads me to the following conclusions. The Chinese want to excel...at everything. The Chinese want to dominate...everything and everyone...including us. In fact, the Chinese want to be us...not us necessarily, but where we have been, where we are...and perhaps more. Methinks that controversial commercial produced by the Citizens Against Government Waste in which a Chinese professor a few years down the road makes his students laugh when, regarding the decline of the US and other past empires in history, he observed, " "Of course, we owned most of their debt, so now they work for us" is probably not so far from reality. I think that the Chines are NOT our friends, and unfortunately, that guns rather than butter may eventually wind up being the unavoidable, bitter, and, perhaps, deadly tonic to settle our stomachs. The scary part of that proposition is that, given China's overwhelming numerical superiority and massive potential for economic growth, power, and influence (not to discount the historically poor track record of command economics over the long haul) MAD, or mutually assured destruction due to our both possessing nuclear arms, may not provide the deterrent to conflict with the Chinese that it did during the Cold War with the Soviet Union.


In my view, we face but a couple of choices regarding the Chinese. Choice one? Compete and compete hard at every turn and in every facet with the Chinese, as though our very national sovereignty and existence depends upon it, because it well may. I think, for instance, that our taking steps backwards militarily, whether it be negotiating nuclear arms agreements with the Russians or allowing the "Debt Dozen" to gut our military spending, is sheer folly, if not genocide (our own). I think that we must initiate massive "Made in America" initiatives to bring manufacturing and jobs back home. Our other course of action is to do nothing, to stick our heads in the sand, to continue to bow in deference to their leaders, and to continue to borrow willy-nilly from their coffers in effort to feed our own apparently insatiable susceptibility for spending.


If we choose this latter path of inaction, if we choose to remain complacent in the face of their scary growth and malevolent machinations, if we fall deeper into debt period, and especially to the Chinese, and if grow even softer than we have become already, then I fear that President Obama will get his wish...we will become just like the Europeans, geopolitical "has beens" and "wannabes", mere shells of our former great and proud selves. We will, as I have postulated previously, become China's lap dog, become like little Shih Tzus drooling upon the knees of the giant of the Far East, the superpower of the twenty-first century and beyond. Now, don't get me wrong...Shih Tsus are cute and all, but I don't want to be one. If I were a dog, if I could choose to be any dog I want, I would never choose to be anyone's neurotic, yapping, prissy little lap dog...not me...I prefer to be the big dog...and like that ancient Chinese proverb (just kidding) says,"You can run with the big dogs, or sit on the porch (or lap) and bark"...calling all Americans!..like we Georgia fans like to say, "Let the big dog eat"...'cause we don't speak wanna' speak no "whine-ese" here...Woof!...






















Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Duke vs. China? The Difference was in the ‘D’

Adorning opposite halves of the courts serving as stages for Duke’s “friendship” series against the Chinese junior national team this past week were two icons that seemed strange bedfellows: the flag of the People’s Republic of China and the signature ‘D’ logo of Duke University athletics. While the contrasting images portrayed an odd and discombobulating amalgam of totalitarianism and academic freedom, they symbolized the spirit of competition, the global appeal that basketball has cultivated in recent decades, and the intermingling of the diverse cultures in Duke’s shiny new Fuqua campus in suburban Shanghai, China.

Pre-game photo opportunities revealed another interesting contrast. When the squads posed together for photographers, the Chinese aggregation appeared the taller and thicker of the clubs, despite their proximate ages. This apparent, sport-specific advantage, when combined with home court, home cooking (no allusion to officiating), and the absence of NCAA CARA (countable athletic related activity) rules in China, seemed to bode poorly for the jet-lagged sightseers from Durham. Yet, when the  final buzzer sounded ending the three-game set Monday, Duke left the Beijing with a hard fought, fisticuffs free sweep of their impressive Chinese opponents.

How? The Devils’ vaunted three-point attack? Relentless assaults on China’s rim by Devil guards driving off of ball screens? Duke’s reliance upon Coach Wooden’s legendary UCLA cut as the staple entry into their offense?  Or a Duke front court finally rising to meet its potential? No, none of these was the deciding factor. To the trained eyes of discerning Duke devotees, the difference was clear. It was that ‘D’ – defense, that is. Clearly frustrated at times by their acculturation to a cleaner, more tightly (and perhaps less biased) officiated style of play, Krzyzewski’s globetrotting charges quickly adapted. Their on-ball defense appeared stingier. Hedges on ball screens were decisive and aggressive. Help defense repelled attacks on the lane and pestered entries into China’s skilled, young posts, while rotations and recoveries from help seemed in sync for a young team with but ten practices under its belt. Even special situation defense sparkled, evidenced by a consecutive sideline overplays resulting in Duke thefts and thunderous dunks. The formula for this surprising, summertime defensive dominance?  A sublime fusion of Coach K’s mastery, defensive tradition, the experience and savvy of veteran players, youth and enthusiasm seeking to impress, and the hustle and competitiveness that derives from team depth.

In recent years, offense has garnered most of the spotlight when talk turns to Duke hoops. Be reminded, however, that ‘K’ earned his spurs, as well as the lion’s share of his 900 victories, by teaching, preaching, and demanding excellence within his “team” man-to-man defensive philosophy. The “fist”, he observes, is stronger than its individual fingers.  It’s easy to forget that Duke’s most recent championship was  built upon the back of a stingy, sagging team defense anchored by  Zubek and Thomas, rather than upon the lethal scoring of the three S’s. Yep, the Duke difference is still in the ‘D.’

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Spend, Tax, and Blame


I am Barak

I am Barak Hussein
Ask me again, and I’ll tell you the same

Do you like American exceptionalism and prosperity, Barak Hussein?

I do not like them, I’m Barak Hussein
I do not like those things, I like to spend, tax, and blame

Would you like them here or there?

I would not like them here or there
I would not like them anywhere
I do not like American exceptionalism and prosperity, I like to spend, tax, and blame
I do not like them, I’m Barak Hussein

Would you like them better if you could see them? Or would you like it better if we were Europeans?

I would not like them even if I could see them, and, yes, I would like it better if we were Europeans
I do not like American exceptionalism and prosperity
I do not like them; I like to spend, tax, and blame
I do not like them, I am Barak Hussein

Would you like them if we taxed our riches, would you like them if we taxed those “fat cat” sons of bitches?

Not even if we taxed it’s wealth
And in so doing, sapped the economy’s health
Not even if we taxed those Wall Street fat cats
And place a levy their evil corporate jets
I do not like American exceptionalism and prosperity, I like to spend, tax, and blame
I do not like them, I’m Barak Hussein

Would you, could you
Be non-partisan and lead?
And like the rest of us
Red, white, and blue bleed?

I would not, could not
Be non-partisan and lead
Patriotism is really tired and old
Besides, getting re-elected is my primary goal

You might like them
You might see
You might like them
If you partied with tea!

No…no…no…no tea for me
I would not, could not party with tea
I just don’t like those things, so just let me be!

I do not like them, they’re so passe
I do not like them, so yesterday
I do not like them, prefer shared sacrifice
I do not like them, playing Robin Hood is nice
I do not like them, prefer wealth redistribution
I do not like them, don’t you just love my elocution?

Would you like them if socialists we became?
Would you like it if the whole world perceived us as really lame?

I would not, could not, even if we were commies
I will not like them, I’d rather blame tsunamis
I will not like them, I’ll just make excuses for us all
I will not like them, and while I'm at it play, some golf and basketball
I will not like them, I’ll make you buy healthcare for the rest of your life
I will not like them, And with my "civil discourse" stir more partisan strife
I will not like them here, more government is the answer
I will not like them anywhere, this damn Tea Party is a cancer
I do not like American exceptionalism and prosperity, I’m Barak Hussein
I do not like them, I prefer to spend, tax, and blame

You do not like them
So you say
Try them! Try them!
And you just may
Try them and you may, I say

If you would only let me be to enjoy the Vineyard and my time to tee!

Come on, just try them and you will see.

No! No! No!
I’d rather continue on the apology tour
And to foreign leaders take my bow de jour
I’d rather strive for double digit unemployment
And blame George Bush just for enjoyment
I think what's needed is another big stimulus
And while I'm at it, I'll throw small business under the bus
Shovel ready projects, now they're the real solution
As long as the all the work is done by the union
And I'll just grant illegals backdoor amnesty
And allow them to sap our services for free
And I will spend…uh, I mean continue to make "investments"
Skyrocket the debt, and upon the rich, levy new assessments
And I will blame everyone on the right as far as the eye can see
I’ll blame everyone and everything but l’il ol’ teflon me
Gee, wish Pelosi, Reed, and the Donks were still doing all the decidin’
Then my biggest worry would be another gaff by Joe Biden
Instead, those conservative folks are blaming me for this credit downgrade
And, man, I wish my that my teleprompter dependency could be downplayed.

I do not like American exceptionalism and properity, you see
Another term of hope and change should ruin 'em, drown them in tea
I like to spend, tax, and blame, don't you just love my Progressive sham
Love big government, regulation, and adult conversations, Barak Hussein I am.